Stanly County's KEYSTONE KOMMISSIONERS

The first fallout from Alcoa's announcement that they are seeking dismissal of their legal appeal regarding the 401 Water Quality Certificate and plan to reapply for a new Certificate seems to be that Stanly County has figured out it no longer has anything to trade.  Yesterday, September 5th, they sent a legal filing to FERC requesting that FERC require, in Alcoa's license, a provision to provide Stanly County with up to 30 million gallons per day of water from the Yadkin River, some of it at no cost (which would exempt Stanly County from license provisions which apply to every other water user), and allow Stanly County to build two new water intakes.  You may recall that two Commissioners recently supported a settlement with Alcoa in which Alcoa would have suported the County in accessing more water, as well as provide the County with money for water infrastructure and economic development, in return for the County's withdrawing its legal roadblocks.  The other three Commissioners rejected the offer.  (see Two Stanly Commissioners Break Ranks)  Apparently the Commissioners are now going over Alcoa's head and asking FERC directly for the water withdrawal rights.

The only thing is, you don't just write a letter (or have your lawyer write a letter) asking for a large water withdrawal!  You may recall that the provision for increased water withdrawal by Albemarle, which was agreed to by Alcoa and the other Relicensing Settlement Agreement signatories, stated that the provision was pending FERC approval.  Albemarle would still have to submit an application, meet requirements, probaby provide one or more consultant reports, I think get a permit from North Carolina, and, I think (I'm not an expert on water withdrawals, but all FERC approvals require extensive applications) allow for public comments.  Then FERC, which has to approve all water withdrawal applications over one milion gallons per day, would have to consider all the ramifications and decide whether it would approve the application.  Stanly County is asking FERC to bypass all these requirements, and require its water withdrawal in the license terms.  Besides that, the deadline for submitting public comments to FERC was years ago!

I'm coining a new term to apply to the Stanly County Board - "Keystone Kommissioners"!   These yohos just don't know what they're doing!

Another interesting factoid in the submission (you can view it in its entirety here http://elibrary.FERC.gov/idmws/file_list.asp?accession_num=20120905...) is that the Commission approved a resolution on this the day before, Setpember 4th.  So, either their attorneys work awfully fast, or there was something going on behind-the-scenes beforehand.  Does anyone know what the vote was on this resolution?  And you can expect some additional legal expenditures to show up.

Stanly County would have been better off if they'd turned a deaf ear to Roger Dick and participated in the relicensing process in good faith.  They're claiming "new circumstances", but I'd suggest it was more a lack of foresight, coupled with their lack of cooperation with the City of Albemarle.

 

Views: 180

Tags: Stanly County, Yadkin River, water withdrawals

Comment by Ann on September 6, 2012 at 4:37pm

Stanly County is required by N. C. Law to provide to the State's Division of Water Resources a Local Water Supply Plan.  Past plans (going back to 1997) and the latest 2011 Provisional Plan (not yet reviewed by DWR staff) can be found here:  http://www.ncwater.org/Water_Supply_Planning/Local_Water_Supply_Pla....

According to this Local Water Supply Plan, Stanly County is currently purchasing all its water from Albemarle and Norwood, a total of 1.004 MGD (million gallons per day).  Present and future contracts would supply up to 2.25 MGD in 2011 and 3.5 MGD beginning in 2016.  The total demand projected for the year 2060 is 1.819 MGD.

And yet, Stanly County is now asking FERC for 30 MGD!

They've got some 'splainin' to do!  (And maybe they could quit causing problems just to cause problems!)

 

Comment by another David on September 7, 2012 at 12:12am

I don't know what the vote was, but this item was not on the September 4th meeting agenda.

They did go into closed session to discuss the 401 water quality certificate.  That's a moot point at this time.  They should quit having closed session meetings about it.

They could have had Alcoa's support for this withdrawal plus $7.5 million if Dunevant, Dennis, and Lowder hadn't voted against Alcoa's last offer.

 

Comment by Whigkid on September 7, 2012 at 3:40pm

Stanly County says it has to have assured water withdrawal rights included in the terms of Alcoa's license.  They have to have it now.  However, I don't find that anyone has assured water withdrawal rights included in the terms of the license.  It seems to me that would limit the ability of FERC and other federal and state agencies, the ones who actually deal specifically with water withdrawals, from regulating water withdrawals.  Are water withdrawal guarantees ever included in FERC licenses?

I love watching the Keystone Kommissioners throw temper tantrums!  Ya know, Stanly County could withdraw water from either Badin (where Albemarle gets its water) or Tillery (where Montgomery County and the Town of Norwood get their water).  Why aren't they making demands of Duke Energy (formerly Progress Energy, formerly Carolina Power & Light)?  Why don't they ever make demands of Duke Energy?

Comment by Don K. Hauté on October 8, 2012 at 1:16pm

The minutes for the Sept. 4 meeting are now online.  They went into closed session to consult with attorney regarding the 401 water quality permit intervention and APGI's public records request.  Then they returned to open session where Chairman Dunevant introduced this resolution as an ANNOUNCEMENT.  It was passed 5-0.  Highly irregular.

Comment

You need to be a member of Yadkin Voices & Views to add comments!

Join Yadkin Voices & Views

The Yadkin River's Online Community

JOIN THE CONVERSATION!

News, views, and tidbits about:

  • Alcoa relicensing issues (Alcoa Yadkin, Yadkin Riverkeeper, Central Park NC, Uwharrie Regional Resources Commission, Stanly County officials and elections)
  • Environment & Conservation
  • Events
  • Recreation
  • Fishing & Hunting
  • Bird watching
  • Wildlife
  • Scenic vistas
  • Art & Photography
  • History
  • and anything  else of interest!

 For more information, please read the About page. 

follow us on twitter and facebook
 

Events

ARCHIVED POSTS

Click on the "BLOGS" tab to see all Blog posts.

Politics

Look who's paying for Pat McCrory's campaign!

NC Division of Water Quality issues 401 Water Certification to Alcoa

Clean sweep for Alcoa against McCrory administration in court

So Much for that River of Opportunity!

Judge asks "Why isn't this like some banaba republic that confiscates property?"

State Board of Elections refers Hartsell campaign finance case to prosecutors

State loses second Alcoa lawsuit

Judge nixes State claim

Three Updates

Dean Naujoks sails into the sunset

Keith Crisco loses primary bid for U.S. House

Former Cabarrus County Clerk of Court Challenges Fletcher Hartsell in District 36

Alcoa remains committeed to the community

Judge throws McCrory lawsuit for a loop

NC Wildlife shoots itself in both kneecaps

FERC denies New Energy's request for rehearing

McCrory's DENR has double-standard

Non-existent URRC acting like nothing's changed

NC Dept. of Administration files suit to have Alcoa riverbed declared state property

URRC:  A legacy of Big Bad Government stains the State's history of freedom

Uwharrie Regional Resources Commission (URRC) dissolved

Mud-slinging as strategy

News Flash:  FERC denies New Energy Capital motion for late intervention

Beating a Dead Horse - Revisited

Stanly County ends dispute with Alcoa

The Masked Marvel Strikes Again!

Stanly County and Alcoa close to settlement

THE ALCOA DRAMA CONTINUES.....

Davidson County signs Alcoa Relicensing Settlement Agreement

$120,000 Geyser of Opportunity (for attention)

Hartsell faces accusations of profiting illegally on two fronts

Davidson Commission support Alcoa relicensing agreement

Political changes

Vote Ascuitto and Lisk Stanly County Commission

MORE STANLY COUNTY LEGAL EXPENSE ON THE ALCOA DISPUTE

Judge approves Alcoa motion to dismiss

Stanly County's KEYSTONE KOMMISSIONERS

Alcoa to seek NEW Water Quality Permit

MORE LEGAL EXPENSE ON ALCOA -- STANLY COUNTY BUDGET

Ascuitto ad runs in Sunday SNAP

Questions for the anti Alcoa Leaders and County Commissioners to answer

Of all the unmitigated gall

Two Stanly Commissioners Break Ranks

STANLY COUNTY BUDGET & "THE LETTER"

MORE STANLY COUNTY MYSTERY....

BANK OF STANLY

PROPOSED STANLY COUNTY BUDGET -- ALCOA & STANLY COMMUNITY COLLEGE

SOME THOUGHTS WHILE REVIEWING THE STANLY COUNTY BUDGET

STANLY COUNTY BUDGET ~~ Schools Loose Again Next Year, ALCOA Dispute Climbs Again This Year

Another mysterious Stanly County Committee

WHAT A POOR JUSTIFICATION IN A LETTER TO THE STANLY NEWS AND PRESS ON THE STANLY COUNTY COMMISSIONERS $5+ MILLION LOCAL TAX DOLLARS DISPUTE WITH ALCOA & MY RESPONSE

Letters to the Editor 5/24/12

Transparency: Alcoa vs. Stanly County

SALISBURY POST ON ALCOA AND STANLY COUNTY

Who is the NC Water Rights Committee - REALLY?

Money and Influence behind the Takeover Campaign

Incumbent Stanly Commissioners in primary faceoff over Alcoa

Stanly County jobs left knocking at the (closed) door

Stanly County & ALCOA

STANLY COUNTY TAX FUNDS SPENT BY THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ON THE ALCOA DISPUTE

"LET'S EXPLAIN THE FACTS RIGHT" not "LET'S GET THE FACTS RIGHT"

Split decision in Stanly County

Bingham primary challengers favor relicensing Alcoa

This 'n' that

Big Bad Government no matter how you look at it

© 2017   Created by Arielle Chastain.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service