"LET'S EXPLAIN THE FACTS RIGHT" not "LET'S GET THE FACTS RIGHT"

So now all 5 County Commissioners have put in their own "hard earned" money to buy ads to try and convince voters of why their two cohorts, up for reelection next Tuesday, deserve your vote. The ads are in the newspaper and have hit the radio airwaves with "Let's Get The Facts Right."

The ad headline is "catchy" and whether or not they meant for it to be misleading is a matter of opinion, but you know the saying "you can cover up dog mess, but it still stinks" sure comes to mind.

Too bad there isn't time to combat these newspaper and radio ads with "Let's Explain The Facts Right."

In fact #1, the 5 commissioners, in an effort to salvage the campaigns of their 2 friends Tony Dennis and Jann Lowder, claim that they have "never sued" ALCOA.

Well, technically, that's true but it's misleading by $5+ million Stanly County Taxpayer dollars that have been spent and authorized by the Stanly County Commissioners to prevent ALCOA and APGI from renewing their license to operate the dams.

Also, the County Commissioners in their advertising effort failed to mention that while the taxpayers of Stanly County continue to pay daily for the Commissioners enormous legal battle, with whomever, that ALCOA continues daily to operate the dams and continues to profit from those operations.

For the taxpayers, the lawsuit means cuts to education, cuts to schools, cuts to other county departments, etc. and surely what must now be an almost depleted county fund balance or "savings account."

In fact #2 the County Commissioners state they didn't vote AGAINST Clean Tech.

Well, technically, that's true too. Their minutes in open public sessions don't reflect an actual vote AGAINST Clean Tech.

To "Explain the Facts Right" the County Commissioners didn't vote FOR Clean Tech either.

So, the Clean Tech offer to the Stanly County Commissioners for the people of Stanly County of 450+ jobs,  millions of investment in our tax base, reimbursement of the county's $5+ million dollars legal expense and a special yearly allocation to the Stanly County Schools was withdrawn and moved on elsewhere.

Looking at fact #3, the County Commissioners rightly claim, in open session anyway, that they have never voted AGAINST jobs.

Again, that's true, as far as we know, of their official actions when not behind closed doors.

On the other hand, there is no evidence that they have aggressively voted FOR new jobs either. Demographic data shows unemployment for Stanly County was 4.9% in 2007 and that unemployment had increased to 10.6% in 2011. Data for 2012 was not available.

Fact #4 is the ole Closed Door Session excuse.

It's plain and simple, you play this trump card when you want to keep specifically authorized items out of the public meeting. It's certainly legal and may, very well, be the correct move for issues of personnel, etc but closed door sessions are an option for the County Commissioners not a requirement. It takes a vote of the majority to go into closed session.

A closed door session breeds mistrust, speculation and spin. The public outcry over the County Commissioners dispute with ALCOA and the Clean Tech proposal are two good examples of taking the option of a closed door session over conducting the peoples business in the open. Doing the peoples business in the open is referred to as the "Sunshine Law" but it sure doesn't seem like that's the rule of order with the current County Commissioners.

Finally, several more "facts" from the 10 years Demographic Data of Stanly County:

 *In 2002 the population for Stanly County was 58,791. Ten years later, in 2011, the population for Stanly County was 59,761.  A growth of 970 people.

 *In 2002 the median age in Stanly County was 37.2 years old. Ten years later, in 2011, the median age for Stanly County is 40.0 years old.

 *In 2002 the school enrollment in Stanly County was 10,204 students, Ten years later, in 2011, the school enrollment in Stanly County was 9,053 students.

Any way you slice this pie, Stanly County is going backwards.

On Tuesday, May 8th, you can vote to agree or disagree with the direction of Stanly County.

 

David Morgan

Former Chairman, Stanly County Board of Commissioners

Views: 199

Tags: ALCOA, COUNTY, STANLY

Comment by CRY ME A RIVER OF OPPORTUNITIE$ on May 2, 2012 at 10:30pm

ROFLMFAO @ Stanly Commissioners trying to pick up this turd by its "clean" end!!!!! 


We're not fools, guys.  Bye-bye, incumbents up for re-election!  TTFN!

Comment

You need to be a member of Yadkin Voices & Views to add comments!

Join Yadkin Voices & Views

The Yadkin River's Online Community

JOIN THE CONVERSATION!

News, views, and tidbits about:

  • Alcoa relicensing issues (Alcoa Yadkin, Yadkin Riverkeeper, Central Park NC, Uwharrie Regional Resources Commission, Stanly County officials and elections)
  • Environment & Conservation
  • Events
  • Recreation
  • Fishing & Hunting
  • Bird watching
  • Wildlife
  • Scenic vistas
  • Art & Photography
  • History
  • and anything  else of interest!

 For more information, please read the About page. 

follow us on twitter and facebook
 

Events

ARCHIVED POSTS

Click on the "BLOGS" tab to see all Blog posts.

Politics

Look who's paying for Pat McCrory's campaign!

NC Division of Water Quality issues 401 Water Certification to Alcoa

Clean sweep for Alcoa against McCrory administration in court

So Much for that River of Opportunity!

Judge asks "Why isn't this like some banaba republic that confiscates property?"

State Board of Elections refers Hartsell campaign finance case to prosecutors

State loses second Alcoa lawsuit

Judge nixes State claim

Three Updates

Dean Naujoks sails into the sunset

Keith Crisco loses primary bid for U.S. House

Former Cabarrus County Clerk of Court Challenges Fletcher Hartsell in District 36

Alcoa remains committeed to the community

Judge throws McCrory lawsuit for a loop

NC Wildlife shoots itself in both kneecaps

FERC denies New Energy's request for rehearing

McCrory's DENR has double-standard

Non-existent URRC acting like nothing's changed

NC Dept. of Administration files suit to have Alcoa riverbed declared state property

URRC:  A legacy of Big Bad Government stains the State's history of freedom

Uwharrie Regional Resources Commission (URRC) dissolved

Mud-slinging as strategy

News Flash:  FERC denies New Energy Capital motion for late intervention

Beating a Dead Horse - Revisited

Stanly County ends dispute with Alcoa

The Masked Marvel Strikes Again!

Stanly County and Alcoa close to settlement

THE ALCOA DRAMA CONTINUES.....

Davidson County signs Alcoa Relicensing Settlement Agreement

$120,000 Geyser of Opportunity (for attention)

Hartsell faces accusations of profiting illegally on two fronts

Davidson Commission support Alcoa relicensing agreement

Political changes

Vote Ascuitto and Lisk Stanly County Commission

MORE STANLY COUNTY LEGAL EXPENSE ON THE ALCOA DISPUTE

Judge approves Alcoa motion to dismiss

Stanly County's KEYSTONE KOMMISSIONERS

Alcoa to seek NEW Water Quality Permit

MORE LEGAL EXPENSE ON ALCOA -- STANLY COUNTY BUDGET

Ascuitto ad runs in Sunday SNAP

Questions for the anti Alcoa Leaders and County Commissioners to answer

Of all the unmitigated gall

Two Stanly Commissioners Break Ranks

STANLY COUNTY BUDGET & "THE LETTER"

MORE STANLY COUNTY MYSTERY....

BANK OF STANLY

PROPOSED STANLY COUNTY BUDGET -- ALCOA & STANLY COMMUNITY COLLEGE

SOME THOUGHTS WHILE REVIEWING THE STANLY COUNTY BUDGET

STANLY COUNTY BUDGET ~~ Schools Loose Again Next Year, ALCOA Dispute Climbs Again This Year

Another mysterious Stanly County Committee

WHAT A POOR JUSTIFICATION IN A LETTER TO THE STANLY NEWS AND PRESS ON THE STANLY COUNTY COMMISSIONERS $5+ MILLION LOCAL TAX DOLLARS DISPUTE WITH ALCOA & MY RESPONSE

Letters to the Editor 5/24/12

Transparency: Alcoa vs. Stanly County

SALISBURY POST ON ALCOA AND STANLY COUNTY

Who is the NC Water Rights Committee - REALLY?

Money and Influence behind the Takeover Campaign

Incumbent Stanly Commissioners in primary faceoff over Alcoa

Stanly County jobs left knocking at the (closed) door

Stanly County & ALCOA

STANLY COUNTY TAX FUNDS SPENT BY THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ON THE ALCOA DISPUTE

"LET'S EXPLAIN THE FACTS RIGHT" not "LET'S GET THE FACTS RIGHT"

Split decision in Stanly County

Bingham primary challengers favor relicensing Alcoa

This 'n' that

Big Bad Government no matter how you look at it

© 2017   Created by Arielle Chastain.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service