Good news on the NC Finishing problem

There's a good article following up on two initiatives we've taken regarding problems at or near the NC Finishing property on the Yadkin River in Today's Salisbury Post: Dredging project shifted 500 feet as Alcoa, Carolina Sand work to p....

1.  Carolina Sand had applied for a permit through Alcoa and FERC for a new sand dredging area which initially would have extended past the Beard Bridge and into the National Register eligible Yadkin River Crossings Historic District.  It would have endangered both the Beard Bridge remains and the archaeological field of the Civil War Battle at the Yadkin Bridge.  I enlisted the support (in terms of a requested resolution) from both the Town of Spencer and the Uwharrie Regional Resources Commission.  Both Alcoa and Carolina Sand were very receptive as soon as they learned about the oversight, and amended their application so that the sand dredging will stop 500' above the Beard Bridge site.  (BTW, I didn't say there was any lapse in federal government approval.  It was all the State Historic Preservation Office's oversight in not informing Carolina Sand's consultant of the presence of the district.)

2.  I also sought resolutions from the Town of Spencer and the URRC to look into the availability of funds to do remediation of the old contamination on the N. C. Finishing property, as well as the more recent mill demolition debris field, and some funding has been identified.

I'd like to thank Spencer Aldermen Jeff Morris and Reid Walters who have been very supportive.  I'd also say that I'm the only person who has tried to use the URRC constructively to do anything other than bash Alcoa.

There's one dipstick comment so far on the story, probably from a redneck relic hunter who thought Carolina Sand's dredging would be the best way to recover artifacts from the river bed.  Since I can't comment on the Salisbury Post site, let me answer it here.  To begin with, buried under the river's sand is a very good place for artifacts.  When air can't reach them, they don't decay.  (We're also interested in looking for any remains of the original bridge.)  In the second place, Carolina Sand has no expertise whatsoever in doing archaeological work, and wouldn't be able to help damaging them, losing them, and certainly losing all context of where they were found.  (Carolina Sand sucks the sand up and sends it through a pipe upriver to their base near Grant's Creek.)  I'd prefer to have a trained underwater archaeologist do the work, thank you!  East Carolina University has an underwater archaeology department, and I've spoken to Dr. Larry Babits there.  This Amateur-Night-in-Dixie suggestion also ignores all the damage the dredging operation would likely do to the Beard Bridge piers.  Besides that, the permit application has already been amended, and the floor is not open for comments from the Peanut Gallery.

Views: 195

Tags: Battle at the Yadkin River Bridge, Beard Bridge, URRC, archaeology, environment, historic preservation, relic hunting

Comment by Whigkid on August 17, 2012 at 8:30pm

Why would archaeologists go through four years of college, get Masters and PhD degrees if some sand dredging operation could do a better job?

 

Comment

You need to be a member of Yadkin Voices & Views to add comments!

Join Yadkin Voices & Views

The Yadkin River's Online Community

JOIN THE CONVERSATION!

News, views, and tidbits about:

  • Alcoa relicensing issues (Alcoa Yadkin, Yadkin Riverkeeper, Central Park NC, Uwharrie Regional Resources Commission, Stanly County officials and elections)
  • Environment & Conservation
  • Events
  • Recreation
  • Fishing & Hunting
  • Bird watching
  • Wildlife
  • Scenic vistas
  • Art & Photography
  • History
  • and anything  else of interest!

 For more information, please read the About page. 

follow us on twitter and facebook
 

Events

ARCHIVED POSTS

Click on the "BLOGS" tab to see all Blog posts.

Politics

Look who's paying for Pat McCrory's campaign!

NC Division of Water Quality issues 401 Water Certification to Alcoa

Clean sweep for Alcoa against McCrory administration in court

So Much for that River of Opportunity!

Judge asks "Why isn't this like some banaba republic that confiscates property?"

State Board of Elections refers Hartsell campaign finance case to prosecutors

State loses second Alcoa lawsuit

Judge nixes State claim

Three Updates

Dean Naujoks sails into the sunset

Keith Crisco loses primary bid for U.S. House

Former Cabarrus County Clerk of Court Challenges Fletcher Hartsell in District 36

Alcoa remains committeed to the community

Judge throws McCrory lawsuit for a loop

NC Wildlife shoots itself in both kneecaps

FERC denies New Energy's request for rehearing

McCrory's DENR has double-standard

Non-existent URRC acting like nothing's changed

NC Dept. of Administration files suit to have Alcoa riverbed declared state property

URRC:  A legacy of Big Bad Government stains the State's history of freedom

Uwharrie Regional Resources Commission (URRC) dissolved

Mud-slinging as strategy

News Flash:  FERC denies New Energy Capital motion for late intervention

Beating a Dead Horse - Revisited

Stanly County ends dispute with Alcoa

The Masked Marvel Strikes Again!

Stanly County and Alcoa close to settlement

THE ALCOA DRAMA CONTINUES.....

Davidson County signs Alcoa Relicensing Settlement Agreement

$120,000 Geyser of Opportunity (for attention)

Hartsell faces accusations of profiting illegally on two fronts

Davidson Commission support Alcoa relicensing agreement

Political changes

Vote Ascuitto and Lisk Stanly County Commission

MORE STANLY COUNTY LEGAL EXPENSE ON THE ALCOA DISPUTE

Judge approves Alcoa motion to dismiss

Stanly County's KEYSTONE KOMMISSIONERS

Alcoa to seek NEW Water Quality Permit

MORE LEGAL EXPENSE ON ALCOA -- STANLY COUNTY BUDGET

Ascuitto ad runs in Sunday SNAP

Questions for the anti Alcoa Leaders and County Commissioners to answer

Of all the unmitigated gall

Two Stanly Commissioners Break Ranks

STANLY COUNTY BUDGET & "THE LETTER"

MORE STANLY COUNTY MYSTERY....

BANK OF STANLY

PROPOSED STANLY COUNTY BUDGET -- ALCOA & STANLY COMMUNITY COLLEGE

SOME THOUGHTS WHILE REVIEWING THE STANLY COUNTY BUDGET

STANLY COUNTY BUDGET ~~ Schools Loose Again Next Year, ALCOA Dispute Climbs Again This Year

Another mysterious Stanly County Committee

WHAT A POOR JUSTIFICATION IN A LETTER TO THE STANLY NEWS AND PRESS ON THE STANLY COUNTY COMMISSIONERS $5+ MILLION LOCAL TAX DOLLARS DISPUTE WITH ALCOA & MY RESPONSE

Letters to the Editor 5/24/12

Transparency: Alcoa vs. Stanly County

SALISBURY POST ON ALCOA AND STANLY COUNTY

Who is the NC Water Rights Committee - REALLY?

Money and Influence behind the Takeover Campaign

Incumbent Stanly Commissioners in primary faceoff over Alcoa

Stanly County jobs left knocking at the (closed) door

Stanly County & ALCOA

STANLY COUNTY TAX FUNDS SPENT BY THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ON THE ALCOA DISPUTE

"LET'S EXPLAIN THE FACTS RIGHT" not "LET'S GET THE FACTS RIGHT"

Split decision in Stanly County

Bingham primary challengers favor relicensing Alcoa

This 'n' that

Big Bad Government no matter how you look at it

© 2017   Created by Arielle Chastain.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service