Good News & Needed Cooperation Along the Yadkin

Good News!  Details about the lower Yadkin River's water quality/dissolved oxygen improvements are now posted at  http://insidestanly.com/?p=7164 .   Because of heavy livestock waste runoffs from north of the Yadkin Project (Alcoa's four hydroelectric dams) and other pollution from further north, the waters of the Yadkin that enter High Rock Lake are in compliance with DENR's dissolved oxygen guidelines only around 50% of the time.  Alcoa's Yadkin Project is now in compliance with the dissolved oxygen guidelines from 97% to 100% of the time at its two lower dams.  (Alcoa is committed to improvements with new oxygen generating turbines at their High Rock Dam and the Tuckertown Dam once their license is renewed.)

I also understand that Alcoa, DENR and the EPA are all very actively working towards PCB remediation in the bay across from the closed smelting plant.

Alcoa is doing their part and they should be held fully accountable for any problems that occurred from their now closed Badin smelting plant.  I hope the many current polluters further north, including municipal waste water treatment plants, Duke's Buck Steam Station, industrial plants, livestock and agricultural operations also do their part to improve the Yadkin's water quality.  Both the EPA and DENR need to be more vigilant in their enforcement of the Clean Water Act.  Sadly, all the major river basins in the state of NC are impaired and need significant environmental improvements.

I had a tour of Alcoa's land and some Land Trust projects north of the I-85 bridge and I was very impressed with the potential creation of new areas to attract quail and waterfowl with the addition of managed warm season native grass areas.  Some funds to preserve that important area, that were raised by the Land Trust for Central NC, have had to be returned to the several land preservation trust funds because of the delay with the license and, therefore, with the implementation of the Relicensing Settlement Agreement.  

In this economic climate it is very difficult to raise funds but to have to return a large block of money that would have greatly benefitted our children and our grandchildren, wildlife and the environment of the Yadkin River is terrible.

Many involved with land preservation along the Yadkin are still pumped!  Jason Walser, with the Land Trust for Central NC, has called the Yadkin Pee Dee River Basin corridor the most important wildlife corridor in the state of NC because it contains significant land buffers from the mountains to the sea.  This major corridor is greatly helped by the existence of the Uwharrie National Forest, Morrow Mt. State Park, the Pee Dee Wildlife Refuge further south and the eventual preservation of Alcoa's land along the Yadkin Project from the edge of Davie County to the end of the Falls Reservoir.  No other river basin in the state of NC has such large, key, pristine preservation areas. 

In reality this unique wildlife corridor from the mountains to the sea is the most important land preservation and environmental enhancement project in NC for our generation.  It should get the support of everyone including hunters, fishermen, birders, hikers, paddlers, ecotourism businesses, new home buyers and innovative businesses who are looking for regions with unique natural appeal and the entire environmental community who understands more fully how FERC actually operates and makes decisions.  Simply put, a takeover or recapture of the Yadkin Project by FERC and the US Congress will not happen, therefore, the efforts by some (with good intentions) to support some sort of public trust operation of the Yadkin Project is not only completely unrealistic but it is now keeping important environmental improvements/projects from happening.

As we know Alcoa's Relicensing Settlement Agreement is supported by 23 key stakeholders including American Rivers.  The waters of the Yadkin are public waters and those public and interstate waters are highly regulated by FERC. All water withdrawal and stream flow in the Yadkin Project is fully controlled by FERC for the benefit of the public.  Hydro power basically does not consume water but simply utilizes it to once again flow downstream, unlike Duke Energy's coal and nuclear plants that actually consumes and evaporates a lot of water. Alcoa's pattern of selling electricity from their dams during times of peak energy demand in our region and in the northeast helps keep additional power plants, in the near future, from being built.

(For more details you may want to review several of my my articles at  http://reunionwithnature.blogspot.com/)

Beginning in a few weeks a key photography project will bring to light the scenic beauty and the environmental necessity for more land preservation along the Yadkin River. The photo exhibit will be available as a traveling program to groups around the state starting by mid-summer. The upland and shoreline property that buffers and protects the Yadkin River Basin and the public waters of the Yadkin can best be protected and preserved by broad cooperation between Alcoa, bordering counties along the Yadkin River, the Land Trust of Central NC, the EPA, DENR, and the state of NC.
 
John D. Young
Albemarle, N.C.

Views: 370

Comment by Whigkid on March 28, 2012 at 7:54pm

Great post!  Thanks for your thoroughness!

Comment by Stop Global Whining on March 28, 2012 at 9:31pm

Spot on, John!  I'm quite impressed by your comment.  But it would also behoove the two large nonprofits who are rattling their tin cups, to make the same clean water demands of the other polluters.

Comment by Whigkid on March 28, 2012 at 10:32pm

What, and dillute their "Alcoa is evil" message?  They'd prefer not to bother the other polluters. 

Comment by John D. Young on March 28, 2012 at 11:47pm

The major work on pollution along the Yadkin is the still relevant A River In Jeopardy by Carpenter, Jackson and Taylor-Guevara.  The real threats are the massive flow of sediments and nutrients into the Yadkin.  Demonizing Alcoa's now closed smelting plant in Badin keeps the current environmental concerns along the Yadkin from getting their greatly needed attention. 

 

Comment

You need to be a member of Yadkin Voices & Views to add comments!

Join Yadkin Voices & Views

The Yadkin River's Online Community

JOIN THE CONVERSATION!

News, views, and tidbits about:

  • Alcoa relicensing issues (Alcoa Yadkin, Yadkin Riverkeeper, Central Park NC, Uwharrie Regional Resources Commission, Stanly County officials and elections)
  • Environment & Conservation
  • Events
  • Recreation
  • Fishing & Hunting
  • Bird watching
  • Wildlife
  • Scenic vistas
  • Art & Photography
  • History
  • and anything  else of interest!

 For more information, please read the About page. 

follow us on twitter and facebook
 

Events

ARCHIVED POSTS

Click on the "BLOGS" tab to see all Blog posts.

Politics

Look who's paying for Pat McCrory's campaign!

NC Division of Water Quality issues 401 Water Certification to Alcoa

Clean sweep for Alcoa against McCrory administration in court

So Much for that River of Opportunity!

Judge asks "Why isn't this like some banaba republic that confiscates property?"

State Board of Elections refers Hartsell campaign finance case to prosecutors

State loses second Alcoa lawsuit

Judge nixes State claim

Three Updates

Dean Naujoks sails into the sunset

Keith Crisco loses primary bid for U.S. House

Former Cabarrus County Clerk of Court Challenges Fletcher Hartsell in District 36

Alcoa remains committeed to the community

Judge throws McCrory lawsuit for a loop

NC Wildlife shoots itself in both kneecaps

FERC denies New Energy's request for rehearing

McCrory's DENR has double-standard

Non-existent URRC acting like nothing's changed

NC Dept. of Administration files suit to have Alcoa riverbed declared state property

URRC:  A legacy of Big Bad Government stains the State's history of freedom

Uwharrie Regional Resources Commission (URRC) dissolved

Mud-slinging as strategy

News Flash:  FERC denies New Energy Capital motion for late intervention

Beating a Dead Horse - Revisited

Stanly County ends dispute with Alcoa

The Masked Marvel Strikes Again!

Stanly County and Alcoa close to settlement

THE ALCOA DRAMA CONTINUES.....

Davidson County signs Alcoa Relicensing Settlement Agreement

$120,000 Geyser of Opportunity (for attention)

Hartsell faces accusations of profiting illegally on two fronts

Davidson Commission support Alcoa relicensing agreement

Political changes

Vote Ascuitto and Lisk Stanly County Commission

MORE STANLY COUNTY LEGAL EXPENSE ON THE ALCOA DISPUTE

Judge approves Alcoa motion to dismiss

Stanly County's KEYSTONE KOMMISSIONERS

Alcoa to seek NEW Water Quality Permit

MORE LEGAL EXPENSE ON ALCOA -- STANLY COUNTY BUDGET

Ascuitto ad runs in Sunday SNAP

Questions for the anti Alcoa Leaders and County Commissioners to answer

Of all the unmitigated gall

Two Stanly Commissioners Break Ranks

STANLY COUNTY BUDGET & "THE LETTER"

MORE STANLY COUNTY MYSTERY....

BANK OF STANLY

PROPOSED STANLY COUNTY BUDGET -- ALCOA & STANLY COMMUNITY COLLEGE

SOME THOUGHTS WHILE REVIEWING THE STANLY COUNTY BUDGET

STANLY COUNTY BUDGET ~~ Schools Loose Again Next Year, ALCOA Dispute Climbs Again This Year

Another mysterious Stanly County Committee

WHAT A POOR JUSTIFICATION IN A LETTER TO THE STANLY NEWS AND PRESS ON THE STANLY COUNTY COMMISSIONERS $5+ MILLION LOCAL TAX DOLLARS DISPUTE WITH ALCOA & MY RESPONSE

Letters to the Editor 5/24/12

Transparency: Alcoa vs. Stanly County

SALISBURY POST ON ALCOA AND STANLY COUNTY

Who is the NC Water Rights Committee - REALLY?

Money and Influence behind the Takeover Campaign

Incumbent Stanly Commissioners in primary faceoff over Alcoa

Stanly County jobs left knocking at the (closed) door

Stanly County & ALCOA

STANLY COUNTY TAX FUNDS SPENT BY THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ON THE ALCOA DISPUTE

"LET'S EXPLAIN THE FACTS RIGHT" not "LET'S GET THE FACTS RIGHT"

Split decision in Stanly County

Bingham primary challengers favor relicensing Alcoa

This 'n' that

Big Bad Government no matter how you look at it

© 2017   Created by Arielle Chastain.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service