Alcoa to seek NEW Water Quality Permit (updated)

In a press release today, Alcoa announced that it will withdraw it's legal appeal of the revocation of the 401 Water Quality Certificate and apply for a new permit.  This has always been an option.  I don't want to speak for Alcoa, but I think it was assumed a new Certificate would have been legally challenged by Stanly County and the Yadkin Riverkeeper just as the current one was.  Once Alcoa submits the new application, DENR has up to a year to act on it.

This lets Stanly County off the hook for now.   The question is, will the Board of Commission in place at the time of the new issuance file another legal challenge then?

Alcoa Seeks to Dismiss Yadkin Project Appeal,
Apply for New Water Quality Certificate

BADIN, NC, August 28, 2012 - Alcoa Power Generating Inc. (APGI) announced today it has filed a motion for an order dismissing without prejudice its appeal concerning the 401 water quality certificate for the Yadkin Hydroelectric Project. If the court grants the motion, APGI will submit a new request for a 401 certification for the Project in an effort to speed up a regulatory process that has been delayed by legal issues for more than three years.

The Yadkin Project received a 401 certificate from the North Carolina Division of Water Quality in May 2009, but it was appealed and later revoked. APGI's appeal of the revocation is currently pending in the North Carolina Office of Administrative Hearings.

"It's time for a fresh start," said Kevin Anton, Alcoa's Chief Sustainability Officer. "While we strongly believe that our original water quality certificate was correctly issued and wrongly revoked, we want to file a new request that clearly reconfirms our commitment to meeting North Carolina water quality standards. This motion to dismiss is the first step in that process."

APGI has worked for the past two years to resolve issues regarding the certificate with the Division of Water Quality and Stanly County. When negotiations finally stalled, APGI began looking for new ways to move the process forward.

Monitoring Shows Significant Water Quality Improvements at Yadkin Project

A new 401 application would provide state environmental officials a new opportunity to evaluate the water quality enhancements proposed by APGI in 2008 and take into account new data that show significant water quality improvements at the Yadkin Project.

APGI has regularly monitored dissolved oxygen levels - a key indicator of water quality - in the tailwaters below its dams. The monitoring data indicates that water quality at the Yadkin Project has improved dramatically since APGI invested more than $5 million in turbine upgrades and other enhancements designed to increase the amount of oxygen in the water.

At Narrows Dam, for example, the level of dissolved oxygen below the dam meets one state water quality standard 100% of the time and another 99% of the time. That represents a 115% improvement since additional technology was installed at Narrows in 2007-2008.

"There should be no doubt that we will meet the state's water quality standards," Anton said. "The
technology we have implemented has been effective and gives us full confidence that our technology will continue to improve dissolved oxygen conditions at the Yadkin Project."

APGI has already completed upgrades at three turbines at Narrows Dam and has committed to invest an additional $80 million to continue improving water quality at the Yadkin Project, beginning with a $40 million investment at High Rock Dam, as a condition of the 401 water quality certificate.

Water Quality Certificate Required for Yadkin Relicensing

The water quality certificate is an important part of the ongoing relicensing effort for the Yadkin Project and certification that the Project will meet water quality standards is an important element of the Federal Energy Regulation Commission (FERC) licensing process.

FERC staff recommended in April 2008 that APGI be issued a new long-term license.

UPDATE

SInce some BS is being thrown around by Alcoa's opponents, here are the facts on Dissolved Oxygen (DO) upgrades.  The Relicensing Settlement Agreement (RSA), signed by Alcoa and a majority of stakeholders, submitted to FERC on May 7, 2007, contained a schedule by which Alcoa would make upgrades to its equipment to improve DO to meet state standards.  RSA_DO_schedule.pdf  This schedule would implement upgrades in phases, based on a May 1, 2008 effective date of a new license.  Since legal challenges filed by Stanly County and the Yadkin Riverkeeper have delayed the effective date, according to the RSA, none of the upgrades are due to be made until a year following the effective date of the new license.

Alcoa has made upgrades to turbines in the Narrows Dam powerhouse AHEAD OF SCHEDULE.  2011 monitoring reports show that Narrows tailwaters met the state daily average standard for dissolved oxygen 100 percent of the time, and met the instantaneous standard 99.9 percent of the time.  (see Dissolved Oxygen Improvements at Narrows Dam *Perfect* for more information.) 

So -- if Stanly County and the Yadkin Riverkeeper would get out of the way, Alcoa would be free to make these and other improvements contained in the Relicensing Settlement Agreement which would benefit the environment, fish and wildlife, the lakes and those who live and recreate there, and area conservation.

 

Views: 194

Tags: Alcoa, FERC, dean naujoks, relicensing, water quality certificate, yadkin riverkeeper

Comment by another David on September 16, 2012 at 2:48pm

DENR is opposing Alcoa's motion to dismiss their legal appeal of the revoked Water Quality Certificate "without prejudice", which would allow Alcoa to reopen the appeal in the future.   http://thesnaponline.com/x2056639131/NC-asks-courts-to-block-ALCOA-... Legalities.  If Alcoa dismissed it "with prejudice" they would be giving up any further appeal rights.  But then, it seems like they'd be able to appeal any problems with a new certification, so I don't know that they need to keep that option.  We could mention that DENR screwed up the first certification by not public-noticing it.  If it hadn't been for that, we wouldn't have had any of this rigamarole.

Predictably, the YRK said DENR was saying something which bore no resemblance to what DENR said.  Why does he keep ignoring the fact that the implementation of dissolved oxygen upgrades at the Narrows Dam prove there are no problems with Alcoa's ability to meet DO standards?

We'll have to see what the judge says.

 

Comment

You need to be a member of Yadkin Voices & Views to add comments!

Join Yadkin Voices & Views

The Yadkin River's Online Community

JOIN THE CONVERSATION!

News, views, and tidbits about:

  • Alcoa relicensing issues (Alcoa Yadkin, Yadkin Riverkeeper, Central Park NC, Uwharrie Regional Resources Commission, Stanly County officials and elections)
  • Environment & Conservation
  • Events
  • Recreation
  • Fishing & Hunting
  • Bird watching
  • Wildlife
  • Scenic vistas
  • Art & Photography
  • History
  • and anything  else of interest!

 For more information, please read the About page. 

follow us on twitter and facebook
 

Events

ARCHIVED POSTS

Click on the "BLOGS" tab to see all Blog posts.

Politics

Look who's paying for Pat McCrory's campaign!

NC Division of Water Quality issues 401 Water Certification to Alcoa

Clean sweep for Alcoa against McCrory administration in court

So Much for that River of Opportunity!

Judge asks "Why isn't this like some banaba republic that confiscates property?"

State Board of Elections refers Hartsell campaign finance case to prosecutors

State loses second Alcoa lawsuit

Judge nixes State claim

Three Updates

Dean Naujoks sails into the sunset

Keith Crisco loses primary bid for U.S. House

Former Cabarrus County Clerk of Court Challenges Fletcher Hartsell in District 36

Alcoa remains committeed to the community

Judge throws McCrory lawsuit for a loop

NC Wildlife shoots itself in both kneecaps

FERC denies New Energy's request for rehearing

McCrory's DENR has double-standard

Non-existent URRC acting like nothing's changed

NC Dept. of Administration files suit to have Alcoa riverbed declared state property

URRC:  A legacy of Big Bad Government stains the State's history of freedom

Uwharrie Regional Resources Commission (URRC) dissolved

Mud-slinging as strategy

News Flash:  FERC denies New Energy Capital motion for late intervention

Beating a Dead Horse - Revisited

Stanly County ends dispute with Alcoa

The Masked Marvel Strikes Again!

Stanly County and Alcoa close to settlement

THE ALCOA DRAMA CONTINUES.....

Davidson County signs Alcoa Relicensing Settlement Agreement

$120,000 Geyser of Opportunity (for attention)

Hartsell faces accusations of profiting illegally on two fronts

Davidson Commission support Alcoa relicensing agreement

Political changes

Vote Ascuitto and Lisk Stanly County Commission

MORE STANLY COUNTY LEGAL EXPENSE ON THE ALCOA DISPUTE

Judge approves Alcoa motion to dismiss

Stanly County's KEYSTONE KOMMISSIONERS

Alcoa to seek NEW Water Quality Permit

MORE LEGAL EXPENSE ON ALCOA -- STANLY COUNTY BUDGET

Ascuitto ad runs in Sunday SNAP

Questions for the anti Alcoa Leaders and County Commissioners to answer

Of all the unmitigated gall

Two Stanly Commissioners Break Ranks

STANLY COUNTY BUDGET & "THE LETTER"

MORE STANLY COUNTY MYSTERY....

BANK OF STANLY

PROPOSED STANLY COUNTY BUDGET -- ALCOA & STANLY COMMUNITY COLLEGE

SOME THOUGHTS WHILE REVIEWING THE STANLY COUNTY BUDGET

STANLY COUNTY BUDGET ~~ Schools Loose Again Next Year, ALCOA Dispute Climbs Again This Year

Another mysterious Stanly County Committee

WHAT A POOR JUSTIFICATION IN A LETTER TO THE STANLY NEWS AND PRESS ON THE STANLY COUNTY COMMISSIONERS $5+ MILLION LOCAL TAX DOLLARS DISPUTE WITH ALCOA & MY RESPONSE

Letters to the Editor 5/24/12

Transparency: Alcoa vs. Stanly County

SALISBURY POST ON ALCOA AND STANLY COUNTY

Who is the NC Water Rights Committee - REALLY?

Money and Influence behind the Takeover Campaign

Incumbent Stanly Commissioners in primary faceoff over Alcoa

Stanly County jobs left knocking at the (closed) door

Stanly County & ALCOA

STANLY COUNTY TAX FUNDS SPENT BY THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ON THE ALCOA DISPUTE

"LET'S EXPLAIN THE FACTS RIGHT" not "LET'S GET THE FACTS RIGHT"

Split decision in Stanly County

Bingham primary challengers favor relicensing Alcoa

This 'n' that

Big Bad Government no matter how you look at it

© 2017   Created by Arielle Chastain.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service